BUT because you can create extensions for the editor, people can write custom extensions that factilitate a lot of the things IDE's have built in. Creating, writing, debugging, building, automating projects are all built into the IDE.An editor on the other hand doesn't necessarily do this, but instead focuses on editing code files. The general idea though is that an IDE comes with built in tools that basically help you along the entire development process right out of the box.
Visual Studio Bad Quality Download 3Rd PartySo Visual Code honestly is a much more light weight alternative since all you're really using it for is "editing".Unity doesn't really have a proper debugger built in and instead relies on the IDE/editor to facilitate that. Unity even does the compiling as opposed to using MSBuild in visual studio.Unity sets up and manages your unity project for you, which means Visual Studio is used primarily as an editor. Unity as its own development environment does a lot of the things Visual Studio would have done for you if you were say writing an ASP.Net/WinForms/WPF/WCF/other Visual Studio style project. An IDE on the other hand will be much slower to actual startup and run (need more processing power), but has all the tools available right away (faster on the user side).In Unity you actually won't be using most of the features that Visual Studio gives you. And rely on those various extensions working with one another especially if you tap into multiple different authors.In the end you can expect the editor to be far more light weight to startup and run (actual processing power requirements), but have a lot more steps to get tools like debugging set up (slower on the user side). Instead you have to write your own extension, or more likely, download 3rd party extensions off some marketplace.![]() ![]() I think it's lack luster, but I have over a decades experience in enterprise development using Visual Studio. So they're not even going to really notice that quite yet.If they ever get to the point where they think VS Code's debugging is lack-luster (which I mean, it's perfectly fine. They don't even know what debugging entails. Which they've already been informed about. Cara setting router wifi cisco first mediaIt's starts up faster, you get to scripting faster, and it gets the job done just fine for a lot of none-engineer types out there. Which is why I suspect they keep saying "light-weight".And in that respect, yeah, VS Code is more light-weight. But I doubt they're anywhere near reaching that skill level to really care at this point.They're probably just looking for intellisense, syntax highlighting, and other standard 'code editor' features (rather than IDE features). Net core included, for vs code)That's the beauty of something like Visual Studio Code.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJoseph ArchivesCategories |